Coroner: Tennis Star Drunk When He Choked to Death
Randall Heffron, the 20-year-old Wofford College tennis player, had a .253 blood alcohol level.
Wofford College tennis player Randall Heffron died of inhaling food he had vomited after a heavy night of drinking, the Spartanburg County coroner confirmed on Thursday afternoon.
Spartanburg County Coroner Rusty Clevenger said alcohol did not kill Heffron, 20, who died at 1:11 a.m. Sept. 10 at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center.
But the coroner confirmed that toxicology revealed Heffron had a .253 blood alcohol level, which is three times the legal definition of intoxication in the state of South Carolina for driving purposes for of-age adults.
"A large mass of food was removed by Emergency Physicians at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center," Clevenger said in a release. "At autopsy the following was recorded: 'Mr. Heffron died as a result of respiratory insufficiency secondary to aspiration of food (so called café coronary).' The elevated ethanol level may have contributed to the vomiting episode which led to extensive aspiration of food.'"
Heffron's death has been ruled as accidental.
Heffron collapsed on the bathroom floor at Shipp Residence Hall at Wofford College just after midnight on Sept. 10.
Read more on Heffron's death, hear 911 calls.
Doctors found a piece of pizza in Heffron's throat while they were attempting to revive him at the hospital, according to his mother Robin Heffron.
That prompted questions from Robin Heffron as to whether or not the initial assumptions made by Wofford College Campus Security and EMS personnel regarding alcohol consumption were correct, and if those assumptions had affected Heffron's treatment.
But while the report confirmed Heffron was intoxicated, it does little to answer questions as to whether or not personnel could have saved his life had they focused on the possibility of an airway obstruction, rather than acute intoxication itself.
Robin Heffron released a statement through the coroner's office.
"The pain of losing a child is compounded by the fact that underage drinking was involved. This tragedy shows that even a gifted athlete such as Randall can succumb to college dorm life and die in an instant if the cause of the medical emergency is not recognized I pray that we can all learn something from this tragedy," she said.
"None of our children are immune to the 'fun' and dangers that come with college life. Parents and students, become familiar with the Heimlich Maneuver. College officials please spread this message. Post Heimlich Maneuver posters in all the dorms and bathrooms.
"I thank you for your overwhelming support during this sad time."
mac
8:54 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011
I have a daughter that is a Junior at Wofford, so I have been following this closely, both through her and other Wofford students as well as in the paper. This is very sad and tragic, but my understanding is Randall had a reputation of being a "partying athelete" at Wofford. I hope I never have to deal with losing a child and my heart goes out to his mother, brother and family. However, I do not feel that Wofford College, their security or the other students involved should feel any blame for this tragic accident. Wofford has supported the family tremendously, and has even taken steps at school thus far this year that have changed campus life. Some have been a little extreme, but have been done. I hope that all can move on from this tragedy and remember that this young man was responsible for his own actions. Again, I am so very sorry this happened, but don't fault/punish the students and staff at Wofford College, which is a wonderful institution, for bad judgement on one students part. I would imagine that this is not what Mr. Heffron would have wanted. God Bless him, his family, friends and all those at Wofford College.....
Ellen Dudash
10:31 am on Friday, October 14, 2011
No matter how you phrase it your comments are insensitive. Your glass house must be made of very thick walls. I too have a college age child who was a friend of Randall's. Please think of all Randall's friends feelings the next time you feel the need to label a child.
Barbara Stuhr
12:51 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011
You must have a heart of stone to have written such a cold and insensitive article for a grieving family who has just lost a precious loving young member of their family to read. I am not defending drinking however, how many of us can say that we or a close loved one has not had too much to drink at some time? My sympathy is to this family who has had a tremendous loss and now has to read your rantings. My sypathy is also for your daughter. You have put her in a vunerable situation with defending your remarks to her peers which there is no defense.
Robin Heffron
2:01 pm on Friday, November 18, 2011
1. It is not up to you, your daughter or any of us to label or judge Randall at age 20. Randall touched more lives in his short time on earth than many of us with a lot longer life span ever will. He was an important part of the Wofford community so what does that say to you?
2. You should hold your judgements about culpibility until you know all the facts...don't assume you know them.
3. I am shocked that you think because Randall or any student happened to have been drinking the night of a medical emergency that excuses or voids that students right to appropriate medical care.
4. What was Randall's bad judgement? Deciding to eat pizza instead of heading to bed at 11:15 on a Friday night? Please read my comments below regarding his cause and manner of death.
It might be time for some self reflection.
Robin Heffron
8:47 am on Monday, November 28, 2011
MAC.
Your referring to Randall as "Mr.Heffron" is a nice attempt to make him appear as something other than someone's child...the fact is he was a young adult who was enrolled and living on a college campus. He left the safe environment of a home and community where in the event of a medical emergency his family and friends would have been thinking first and foremost about getting him appropriate care for the real cause of his distress, There is a certain expectation on the part of a parent and a student that safety standards are maintained and monitored when you are living in a college owned dormitory...that is a reasonable expectation. There is a level of responsibility on the part of a college that cannot be denied and should not be shifted to the student. Referring to Randall by anything other than his name does not change that...nor does it change the fact that at the end of the day he was my child. If this happened to your child maybe you would see things differently. Furthermore, in terms of support...we have been pretty kind to Wofford as well considering my child lost his life on that campus. I guess it all depends on what seat you are sitting in on this journey called life. If you were in my seat perhaps you would have a different perspective.
Robin Heffron
9:39 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011
MAC,
FYI...Randall chose to attend Wofford College because it fit his life goals which at the time were to play Division I college tennis at an academically challenging school because he had hoped to attend dental school following graduation. His goals were clear and focused. I don't think you can have those life goals at age 20 and expect to "party" every night...nor do I think you can reach his level of success and accomplishment if that was a priority. Your "understanding" of Randall is unwarranted and inappropriate. I do think it was important to Randall to enjoy life and his college experience. I wish you could have known him. He was an amazing human being with limitless potential because of the way he treated people. The world will miss out on Randall and so will you. One of his greatest gifts was that he never judged others...I don't believe I ever heard him say an unkind word about anyone! I am sorry you will not have the chance to learn from him.
Cheryll Woods-Flowers
9:52 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011
Mac,
I can appreciate that you feel the need to defend the school and their staff but fail to see the merit in your need to post an insinuation about Randall, no matter what your "understanding" is. Remember that we all live in glass houses and that there but for the grace of God go I, or you.
Alison
11:00 am on Friday, October 14, 2011
http://www.factsontap.org/factsontap/naked_truth/blood_alcohol_levels.htm
A man who is 160 lbs and has a blood alcohol level of .253 would mean he had 10 drinks in an hour.
Robin Heffron
2:27 pm on Friday, November 18, 2011
Please see my comments below...Randall was 6'2 and weighed 192 lbs...your information is a little off. Your statement about consuming the alcohol in an hour is puzzling and not relevant.
John
2:14 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011
I think Mr. Mac understands what college life is like and that everyone is responsible for his/her own actions, even if the results are tragic. You have to teach your children right and hope they get it. Why didn't his friends help out /talk/explain more? We will never know, but I don't thing Mr. Mac "insinuated" anything because the coroner stated the facts.
Robin Heffron
2:14 pm on Friday, November 18, 2011
John,
Please see my comments to "Mac". Please also see my comments below. You should never assume that every article is factual or that every Coroner has a medical background. Randall was taught right from wrong and he did "get it". His friends were with him that night and had also had been enjoying a typical Friday night on campus. The issues and conversations regarding underage drinking are complicated but judging Randall does not make things better especially when we are talking about the safety of our children in college dorms where medical emergencies are concerned...note: the cause and manner of death.
Dawn Stewart
9:03 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011
Why are all the comments here being deleted? Facts are facts, and I don't understand what good it serves to cover up facts.
Louise
9:53 pm on Friday, December 23, 2011
Dawn, I would like to talk with you further about your comments on this article. Especially the unigo.com. Thank you.
Dawn Stewart
2:50 pm on Saturday, October 15, 2011
Wofford:
http://www.unigo.com/Colleges/UserReviews.aspx?userid=154542
UUU
2:03 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011
^^^^ Everyone needs to read this... especially the part about student activities.
Vincent Rossi
11:16 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011
We have been researching colleges and came across this site when typing in "wofford". First, my prayers are with the family for losing such a caring son, brother, and grandson. But after reading the review in that link, and the comments here, I am having serious concerns about my daughter's safety if she were to attend this college. From the user review: "If you don't drink, don't come to Wofford College. That should be the first thing that is said on the tours of the school. Social life is 110 percent centered around drinking. If you don't drink, you're an outcast at Wofford. Saying no to a beer (served freely to minors at every frat party, every single friday and saturday night), is like slapping someone in the face. And don't even think about even rushing a sorority/fraternity if you don't drink. As for drugs, there's a large use of non-prescribed pill usage on campus (vicodin, xanax, adderall, etc). The main parties happen on weekends, at The Row (where, again, MINORS ARE SERVED ALCOHOL, EVERY SINGLE NIGHT FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT. AT EVERY SINGLE FRATERNITY HOUSE PARTY). But, that being said, students also 'party' in their rooms. And by party, I mean drink with small groups of people. The drinking on this campus is out of control. The rule is that RAs can't check drawers or fridges, so obviously they're stocked with beer, four loko, and various kinds of hard liquor. Students drink in their rooms, by themselves. It's unsafe, and quite frankly, very very sad."
Vincent Rossi
11:25 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011
(continued) Other comments here refer to this as a "typical Friday night on campus", and serious concerns exist if proper care was taken and this tragedy could have been prevented.
Should we look elsewhere in our search for the right college??
riley
2:20 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
I agree with UUU - EVERYONE needs to read this about Wofford. Does anyone have any idea who wrote these comments on Unigo?
riley
2:28 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
I understand that the background of the campus safety officers on campus is military in training and wondered if anyone knew what qualified them to investigate a death, rape or any other serious or potential criminal event on campus? More importantly, what qualifies them to render medical care in the event of a medical emergency? It sounds like campus safety made the 911 call and then got the investigation back as the investigating arm. I wondered who would have to make the decision to have an outside agency investigate? This poor grieving mother/family? The Board of Trustees? The Coroner's office? Just thought you might have the inside track.
Robert
8:50 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
The problem is, and always has been, the elitist attitude surrounding Wofford College. Wofford students have been allowed for years to break laws that all others are held accountable. Currently there are billboards around Spartanburg showing individuals that have been fined over $10,000 for allowing underage drinking. Students at other schools are arrested in their own apartments and homes for underage drinking. But at Wofford, it has always been known that it was freely allowed on campus. Now an underage Wofford student dies and there is no investigation into where he obtained the alcohol. Students at SCC, USCU, and SMC have been charged for open container, handing a beer to another, and even having unopened alcohol in their possession. Bar owners are harassed over underage drinking, with the city sending in underage undercover agents with fake IDs to arrest bartenders and bar owners. Again the hypocrisy known as Wofford defines the inequalities in Spartanburg, proving once it again that in Spartanburg it all comes down to who you know. And speaking of who you know, rumor is that it is widely known who provided the alcohol, but he is a "good boy" so nothing will be done.
Adam Crisp
10:18 am on Monday, October 17, 2011
Our site automatically removes comments if they are flagged multiple times by readers. If a comment disappeared, it should have only done so temporarily. While some of these comments may be controversial, none violate our rules, but many have been flagged for removal by readers.
Dawn Stewart
12:32 pm on Saturday, October 29, 2011
Does anyone believe this warrants investigation? Has anyone been charged with providing the alcohol to this underage student? Did the coroner succumb to political pressure and rule this accidental instead of initiating an investigation?
Robin Heffron
12:25 pm on Friday, November 18, 2011
This article sheds some light on whether appropriate care was rendered in a timely manner to Randall on the night he choked. It does, however, contain some gross inaccurancies that should be noted. First and foremost it should be noted that the Coroner's office says it did not make the statement to this reporter "following a night of heavy drinking"...I guess that is your word against the Coroner's office. The accuracy of the BAC level is always questionable when the blood was taken from a decomposing body 5-6 hours following death...ethynol rises in a decomposing body. The Coroner did not render medical opinions because he does not have a medical background. This is just one example of why reporting BAC level alone is sometimes misleading. Second, the piece of pizza recovered from Randall's trachea was 3 inches x 11/2 -2 inches with the crust attached and folded over as if inhaled in one bite. This article would lead the reader to believe that Randall got this large piece down the first time in his digestive track, vomitted it up because of alcohol and then aspirated it back down his trachea...a medical mind would dispute this theory based on the size of the pizza. If you got it down the first time and brought it back up it is doubtful that you would aspirate it...more than likely you would just spit it out. Randall straight up choked. The title of this article and some things represented as fact in it are disputable and somewhat irrisponsible.
Robin Heffron
1:39 pm on Friday, November 18, 2011
It should also be noted that the term "legal" limit is used to measure whether or not someone would be found guilty of a DUI when operating a motor vehicle. Using this term in an artiicle regarding Randall's death is misleading. Randall was not driving a motor vehicle at any time that night...he was walking, talkiing, laughing, dancing and eating pizza. The level of his intoxication should not be evaluated by using BAC level alone because it would depend on many factors...including the fact that he was 6'2 and weighed 192 lbs. with an athletic metabolism and had eaten twice in a four hour period. I question whether or not his BAC level really is "news" worthy since no where on his death certificate will you find alcohol or alcohol related wording regarding his cause or manner of death...not even under "other significant conditions". I do not feel as though I need to defend Randall...he was a normal 20 year old college student on a college campus...Friday night..first weekend night back following summer break. I feel as though I am called to defend the truth. The issue of underage drinking and how it affects the lives of students on college campus is complicated. Reporting and wording is so important in these types of deaths because so many lives are affected...especially family members like grandparents who are very fragile. Please be more considerate in the future...not only to our family but also to other families that have lost loved ones at a young age.
Wofford Graduate
3:47 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I think you should all be ashamed of your comments. I graduated from Wofford College and spent four of my best years there. I heard many things about Randall, having not known him, and he was very well liked among all of the students. This is a tragedy but shifting blame onto the school and bad-mouthing Wofford is certainly not the path you should take. Before you turn and judge Wofford I think it might be in your best interest to meet some of the graduates. They are successful, caring, loving, and well respected members of society. Simply reading a review from someone online who obviously was not a best fit at Wofford and then going off of solely his or her opinion is ignorant. There is a place for everyone at Wofford, Christian, Jewish, Drinker, Non-Drinker, athlete, greek, academically gifted or not and to bad mouth a great school like Wofford looking in from the outside is a disgrace. I am very saddened that many of us will never get to know Randall and I think about and pray for his family a lot. But before all of you go and bad mouth the school you should think about the love Randall had for it and stop. It will forever be a great part of my life and I know it will for Randall as well. God bless him and his family.
Dawn Stewart
4:40 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Makes you wonder what is taught, if anything, at that school. To quote Jesse from her review:
"The Wofford social scene is an extremely dangerous one, with kids binge drinking and almost overdosing every single weekend. But doing those things goes against the honor code, so Wofford sweeps it under the rug. It's only a matter of time before someone DIES and Wofford is SUED, based on the way that things are being run at Wofford College. It's SHOCKING that it hasn't happened yet. The school is a lawsuit waiting to happen."
She sure did indicate that the lack of controls on campus would have serious consequences.
And now someone who says they are a Wofford graduate is defending the lack of controls, defending the lack of assistance to this student, defending the lack of an investigation as to who purchased the alcohol that led to this death, and defending the failure of the policy that students could not call 911 when in need of medical attention (keep all issues on campus and out of the news). Would not a wise graduate be asking for changes in policy, and a complete investigation into the events so as TO PREVENT this from ever happening again on campus?